TWQ: R2P after Libya and Syria: Engaging Emerging Powers - Spring 2013

This paper examines the 'responsibility to protect' (R2P) in the cases of Libya and Syria. The use of force-no matter how benevolent, enlightened, or impartial in intent has dramatic consequences. It shapes the struggle for power and helps to determine the outcome of political contests, which is why it is inherently controversial. It is why international debates about Libya-the first road test of the Responsibility to Protect’s (R2P) coercive element (also knownas Pillar Three)-were understandably contentious. Pillar Three is defined as ‘‘the responsibility of Member States to respond collectively in a timely and decisive manner when a State is manifestly failing to provide . . .protection.’’

Libya proved to be a textbook illustration justifying the responsibility to protect (R2P) principles, but its implementation also demonstrated the need for legitimacy criteria. Engaging the emerging powers on these criteria is in the mutual interest of these powers and those who support R2P.

Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) 2013

CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C.  The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look to the future and anticipate change.